Thus Sutherland himself drew attention to the different needs and preferences of learning individuals, who significantly contribute to deciding whether deviant actions and attitudes are accepted or not. In the past, Sutherland was often accused of theoretical gaps in his concept, for which other theories or theoretical extensions were developed. In the sense of the ultimately decisive imbalance in theory between associated attitudes that favour violations of the law and attitudes that evaluate violations of the law negatively, it must therefore be the goal of justice and society to surround criminals with non-criminals or to dissolve social spaces in which predominantly people with deviant motives and patterns of action live.įurthermore, criminal law must build on the ideal of rehabilitating offenders. Since criminal attitudes and activities can be learnt, these can be logically deduced and re-learned, or compliant behaviour, attitudes and rationalisation can be achieved in the first place. Sutherland’s theory of differential association stands for a rehabilitative ideal. Non-criminal behaviour can also infer from exactly the same values and needs (e.g.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |